(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Review — Affirmance in Absence of Brief. Where no briefs in support of an appeal from a conviction for a felony are filed in this court, and the evidence reasonably sustains the judgment, and no jurisdictional or fundamental error appears, the case will be affirmed.

Appeal from District Court, Seminole County; W.J. Crump, Judge.

Jack Warren was convicted of shooting with intent to kill, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Phillips & Huggins, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., for the State.

EDWARDS, P.J. The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Seminole county on a charge of shooting with intent to kill, and was sentenced to serve a term of five years in the state penitentiary.

Page 68

The record discloses that at the time charged the defendant was married to Beatrice Warren, who was 17 years of age. They had been separated about 10 days, and apparently the shooting was because of this marital difficulty. Defendant shot his wife twice in the breast, one of the bullets going entirely through the body and lodging under the skin in the back. Defendant did not testify, but offered evidence of good character and evidence tending to establish that he was insane or mentally irresponsible at the time. This issue was submitted to the jury.

The evidence amply sustains the judgment. No briefs have been filed by defendant in support of the appeal. No material error is made to appear.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.