(Syllabus.)

Habeas Corpus-Court Will not Consider Grounds or Facts Existing When Former Application Was Made. Where Criminal Court of Appeals has denied application for writ of habeas corpus, it will not ordinarily entertain subsequent application for such writ on same grounds and facts or any other ground or facts, existing when first application was made, whether presented then or not.

Original habeas corpus proceeding by Buber Arthur to secure release from the State Penitentiary. Writ denied.

Buber Arthur, in pro per.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

JONES, J. The petitioner, Buber Arthur, has filed his verified application for a writ of habeas corpus, wherein it is alleged that he is unlawfully imprisoned in the State Penitentiary at McAlester, under a commitment issued from the district court of Greer county, upon a plea of guilty for the crime of murder.

The facts alleged in said petition are substantially the same as the facts alleged in the petition by the petitioner heretofore presented to this court and which was denied. Ex parte Arthur, 60 Okla. Cr. 287, 64 P.2d 344.

A demurrer to the petition was interposed on behalf of respondent.

The rule of this court is that where an application for writ of habeas corpus has been denied, this court will not ordinarily entertain a subsequent application for a writ based on the same grounds and the same facts, or any other grounds or facts existing when the first application was made, whether presented then or not. Ex parte Berrie, 75 Okla. Cr. 115, 129 P.2d 88.

Page 316

For the reasons above stated, the demurrer to the petition is sustained and the cause is dismissed.

BAREFOOT, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.