(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Review — Absence of Briefs. When an appeal has been taken from a conviction for unlawfully having possession of narcotics, and no briefs are filed, this court will examine the record, and, if no fundamental errors were committed, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Appeal from District Court, Washington County; A.C. Ferrell, Judge.

Sam Allen was convicted of unlawfully having possession of narcotics, and he appeals. Affirmed.

J.R. Charlton, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., for the State.

DAVENPORT, J. This appeal was filed September 10, 1925, and no briefs have been filed in support of the appeal.

Page 440

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was charged with the crime of unlawful possession of narcotics, and convicted, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary at McAlester.

Under the rule of this court, where an appeal is not supported by briefs, it is assumed that the appeal has been abandoned or is without merit. The court has examined the record and finds that the information sufficiently charges the offense; that the evidence supports the charge; that the instructions of the court were reasonably fair to the defendant; that there were no errors in the introduction of the testimony prejudicial to the rights of defendant; and that the defendant was accorded a fair and impartial trial.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

DOYLE, P.J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.