(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Review — Where no Brief Filed. Where an appeal has been taken from a conviction and no briefs are filed, this court will examine the record, and, if no fundamental errors were committed, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Appeal from District Court, Kay County; Claude Duval, Judge.

E.J. Cole was convicted of bank robbery with firearms, and he appeals. Affirmed.

J. Earl Smith, H.S. Hines, and Howard F. Wilson, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., for the State.

DAVENPORT, J. The plaintiff in error, E.J. Cole, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of the crime of bank robbery with firearms, in the district court of Kay county, Okla., and was sentenced to a confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 10 years. Motion for new trial was filed and overruled, and defendant duly excepted. From the judgment and sentence so rendered, the defendant appeals.

The defendant has filed no brief supporting his assignment of errors, although the time for filing the brief has long since passed, and various extensions of time to file the brief have been granted. Where no briefs are filed, the court will examine the record proper, and, where no prejudicial error is apparent, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

After a careful examination of the record, the court finds that the information is sufficient; that the testimony is sufficient to support the verdict; that the instructions

Page 152

fairly stated the law applicable to the case and were fair to the defendant; and it appears that the defendant was otherwise accorded a fair trial.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

DOYLE, P.J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.