(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Affirmance Where No Briefs Nor Oral Argument. Where no briefs are filed in support of an appeal and no appearance for oral argument made and examination of the record shows no jurisdictional or fundamental error, the case will be affirmed.

Appeal from County Court, Garfield County; A.A. Stull, Judge.

Lula Shaw and another were convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor, and they appeal. Affirmed.

Geo. W. Buckner, for plaintiffs in error.

Dan Mitchell, Co. Atty., and A.L. Zinser, Asst. Co. Atty., for the State.

Page 56

CHAPPELL, J. The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor. The jury fixed the punishment of the defendant, Lula Shaw, at 30 days in jail and a fine of $250, and fixed the punishment of the defendant, Ward Shaw, at imprisonment in the county jail for 90 days and a fine of $250.

The case was tried in April, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, and the case is therefore affirmed.

EDWARDS, P.J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

On Rehearing.

CHAPPELL, J. On rehearing the judgment is modified as to the defendant Lula Shaw by reducing the fine from $250 to $100, and, as modified, the cause is affirmed. Mandate ordered issued.

EDWARDS, P.J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.