1. Syllabus Followed. The same issues are involved as were involved In Hughes v. State, 83 Okla. Cr. 16, 172 P.2d 435. The syllabus of that case is adopted as the syllabus of this case.

2. Searches and Seizures-Sufficiency of Description of Premises in Search Warrant. If the descriptions in search warrant are sufficient to enable officer executing the search warrant to locate the premises to be searched without aid of any other information save that contained in warrant, the warrant Is sufficient.

3. Appeal and Error-Conclusiveness of Finding That Search Warrant Sufficiently Described Premises. In hearing on motion to suppress evidence, court's finding on disputed question of fact as to whether search warrant sufficiently described defendant's premises will be sustained where there is competent evidence in record to support finding.

4. Same Fundamental Issue Determined by Criminal Court of Appeals. Where issue raised is fundamental, directed to jurisdiction of trial court, Criminal Court of Appeals will determine matter, even though raised for first time on appeal.

5. Constitutional Law-Waiver of Rights by Accused. A defendant in a criminal case may waive any right not inalienable, given him by the statute or by the Constitution, either by express agreement or conduct, or by such failure to insist upon it in seasonable time as will operate as an estoppel to his afterwards setting it up against the state.